![]() Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. " Evaluation of infrared techniques for the assessment of biomass and biofuel quality parameters and conversion technology processes: A review," " Economic evaluation of short rotation coppice systems for energy from biomass-A review," Hauk, Sebastian & Knoke, Thomas & Wittkopf, Stefan, 2014." Energy and CO2 analysis of poplar and maize crops for biomass production in north Italy," " Spatial variation of environmental impacts of regional biomass chains," " Economic Evaluation of the Production of Perennial Crops for Energy Purposes-A Review,"Įnergies, MDPI, vol. Ewelina Olba-Zięty & Mariusz Jerzy Stolarski & Michał Krzyżaniak, 2021." Bioenergy for heat and electricity in the UK: A research atlas and roadmap,"Įnergy Policy, Elsevier, vol. " US billion-ton update: biomass supply for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry,"Ĩ9324, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2011. Robert Perlack, Robert & Eaton, Lawrence & Thurhollow, Anthony & Langholtz, Matt & De La Torre Ugarte, Daniel, 2011." Ranking yields of energy crops: A meta-analysis using direct and indirect comparisons," " Effect of Climate and Agricultural Land Use Changes on UK Feed Barley Production and Food Security to the 2050s," These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one. " Policy implications of competition between conventional and energy crops," " Ground Beetles ( Carabidae ) in the Short-Rotation Coppice Willow and Poplar Plants-Synergistic Benefits System,"Īgriculture, MDPI, vol. Natalia Stefania Piotrowska & Stanisław Zbigniew Czachorowski & Mariusz Jerzy Stolarski, 2020." Invertebrate and Plant Community Diversity of an Illinois Corn–Soybean Field with Integrated Shrub Willow Bioenergy Buffers," Colleen Zumpf & John Quinn & Jules Cacho & Nora Grasse & Maria Cristina Negri & DoKyoung Lee, 2021." Willow Cultivation as Feedstock for Bioenergy-External Production Cost,"Įnergies, MDPI, vol. Ewelina Olba-Zięty & Mariusz Jerzy Stolarski & Michał Krzyżaniak & Kazimierz Warmiński, 2020.It is concluded that introducing well-managed SRCs can enrich biodiversity in an agriculture-dominated landscape, but that SRCs most probably have a negative effect on biodiversity when introduced into a highly forested landscape. Recommendations for policy makers and SRC growers are provided, and areas for future research have been identified. Arthropods and small mammals use the SRC to fulfil all of their habitat needs, while birds and large mammals only use the SRC for a limited number of resources. Bird populations similarly evolve from open-space to forest communities, continuously co-existing in shifting ratios. These changes in the plant community influence animal diversity. At every coppice rotation the light availability changes and the planted area evolves from a bare field to a shrub-like vegetation, which later approaches a forest with a closed canopy. Besides the planted genera and species, an understorey of generalist species similar to the previous land use develops and evolves to a forest-like understorey. In comparison with agricultural monocultures SRC provides a higher biodiversity, but it remains lower than that of mixed deciduous forests. SRC had a positive effect on fungal diversity, which was negatively correlated to coppice rotation length, due to a higher nutrient demand after coppicing. ![]() The α- and β-diversity were most often studied by quantifying species richness and abundance. From the 47 reviewed publications of this review 91% reported on poplar or willow SRC, and 63% focused on animal diversity. Although short-rotation coppice (SRC) is a sustainable cultivation technique, biodiversity issues keep policy makers from encouraging farmers to establish SRC.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |